Forum:Clause in the deletion policy

Right. This would be more suited to the next Council of Blood, but since I'm impatient and probably won't be around for that, I thought I'd raise the issue now. Under the new rules, we're not meant to delete anything on the spot because it's crap. However, I would like to adopt a policy allowing Articles that have no content are liable to be deleted on the spot. Basically, it means we're allowed to delete one line articles that make no attempt at humor and are not properly formatted/categorised. Example: "Bob was a man." Additionally, articles that make no sense all on their own (e.g.they're making a joke about something in another article) E.g. "Has been forgotten was a walking carpet," which is a "joke" related to the Han Solo article: "He hung out with a giant Walking carpet whose name has been forgotten." If an article gets deleted but someone else deems it to "have content," then a discussion/un-deletion should ensue. So...:

Exact wording: "Articles that are deemed to have 'no content' by one or more administrators are liable to be deleted on the spot. Additionally, if a commoner regular user feels an article has 'no content,' he/she can request its deletion on its talk page or the IRC. 'No content' is defined as containing no attempt at humour, original humour, standalone humour, consisting only of template/quote/infobox, or any mixture of the above. Final discretion is left to the administrator(s), though appeals are welcome." (Yes, I know it's a mouthful).